A boardroom review provides the table to evaluate their performance in a comprehensive manner. It assists tables to identify weaknesses in their leadership relationships and the culture they operate in as well as the facets of longevity. It helps ensure that those who pay for membership at tables are adequately equipped to fulfill their responsibilities.
This research area is in its early stages of development and many difficulties remain. The current evidence-based evidence provides diverse https://www.boardroombook.com/guide-to-board-succession-planning/ results on how dissent impacts boards and their function. While some studies report positive (Zona 2016) and curvilinear effects, others find negative (Brown, Buchholtz and Butts 2019) as well as mixed or non-significant results (Heemskerk, Heemskerk, and Wats 2015; Minichilli et al. 2012) interactions between dissent as well as the board’s performance.
Moreover, the existing research is lacking a deeper understanding of what drives the dynamics of dissent. Future research should create an integrated theoretical framework to contextualize this governance phenomenon. This might include the use and application of configurational methods (Federo and Saz-Carranza 2018, Schiell, Lewellyn and Yan 2023) to help researchers more precisely understand how individual board attributes process, processes, and contexts relate to necessary and sufficient causality in governance processes.
Finaly, some studies use a narrow definition for disagreement, but do not provide precise measurement methods. These studies are more susceptible to measurement errors. Thus, it would be important to develop more robust and precise dissent measurement techniques.